How Much Estate Planning Risk Can Your Family Absorb?
There’s a moment in every new client meeting where the conversation turns to risk. How would you feel if this dropped fifteen percent in a quarter? Twenty-five? What would keep you up at night?
I spent years working alongside financial planners, so I heard a version of that conversation more times than I can count. It’s a good conversation. The client thinks about it properly, because a good planner asks in a way that makes them think about it. The answer gets written down and built around, and it gets looked at again every year to see if anything’s changed.
That part of the work is done right. You find out what someone’s willing to put up with, you find out what they could actually survive, you measure both against what they say they want, and you keep adjusting until those three things line up. Nobody builds an investment portfolio without doing it.
Then the conversation gets to the estate, and it’s two questions. Do you have a will? Do you have a power of attorney? Yes and yes, tick, tick, next section. Two of the biggest decisions a person will ever make, getting less attention than a fund switch. That’s estate planning risk, and almost nobody measures it.
Who actually feels it
In the financial planning world, here’s what makes a risk tolerance assessment work, and it’s so obvious nobody verbalizes it. The person answering the questions is the person who has to live through the answer.
If you tell me you can handle a thirty percent drawdown, you’re the one opening the statement. You’re the one sitting with it at your kitchen table. That’s what makes your answer worth anything. You’re not guessing at how somebody else might cope, you’re telling me about your own experience of something you’ve either felt before or can imagine feeling.
Estate planning pulls that apart.
You answer the questions. Your executor gets the consequences. So does your spouse, so do your kids, so does your business partner if you’ve got one. None of them filled anything out. Nobody asked what they could handle or whether they’d ever handled anything like it. They inherit a risk position you picked for them, and they find out what you picked when you’re no longer around to explain yourself.
So the real question was never how much risk you’re comfortable with. It’s how much risk you’re comfortable handing to your daughter.
I’ve never heard anyone ask it that way. When I started asking it that way, things got real for those doing the planning and the answers were completely different.
Three things worth measuring
We’ve already got the framework. We just point it at the investment portfolio and stop there. Here’s how it looks for estate planning.
Tolerance. How much mess are you willing to leave behind? Almost nobody’s been asked. Ask it and the answer, obviously, is of course not. Then you walk through what their current setup would actually produce and the two answers don’t match at all. They weren’t being careless. They’d just never seen what their own plan would do.
Estate capacity. This is the one that matters most and I’ve almost never seen anyone assess it. I want to be careful with the word, because in our world “capacity” usually means mental capacity, whether someone can sign a document, when a power of attorney kicks in. That’s a different conversation entirely. Estate capacity is about the estate itself and the people involved. Is there cash to pay the tax bill on the final return, or does something have to be sold in a hurry to find it? Is your executor someone with the time, the skill, the health and the standing in the family to do this? Will your family still be speaking to each other after they disagree about the house?
None of that’s about you. Estate capacity belongs to the people you leave behind, and you’re usually the last person who can see it clearly.
Required risk. Does your plan actually produce what you say you want? Take a business owner who wants one of his three kids to take over the company and the other two treated fairly. That isn’t a wish, it’s a construction project. He needs a valuation, money to fund a buyout, an agreement his kids have actually read, and probably a policy to make the numbers work. If none of that exists, he isn’t taking a small risk on the outcome. There’s no version of events where he gets what he wants. Wanting something and paying for it aren’t the same thing.
WHAT ESTATE CAPACITY ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE
Desmond was 61 when he died and his file was in good shape. Current will, current beneficiaries, a portfolio he’d built with his advisor to a moderate risk profile over twenty years and reviewed every spring. What nobody had ever looked at was whether his estate could handle anything going wrong. Almost everything he owned was in a rental property and an RRSP. Between the deemed disposition on his final return and the RRSP collapsing into a single year of income, his estate owed a tax bill it had no cash to pay. His daughter was the executor. She put the rental on the market in February, in a slow month, and it sold for about seventy thousand less than it would’ve brought the previous spring. Desmond spent twenty years staying away from anything volatile. The volatility found his estate anyway, and his daughter was the one left to deal with it.
The combination that does the damage
If you take one thing away from this, consider this pairing.
High tolerance sitting next to low estate capacity is behind nearly every estate disaster I’ve worked on or watched from a distance. The person isn’t worried. They’ve got a will, they signed it a while back, and they figure everyone will work it out. Meanwhile the people who have to work it out have no cash, an executor who’s never done this before, and a brother and sister who weren’t getting along before there was money involved.
Tolerance and estate capacity are both easy to miss on their own. Someone who isn’t worried just looks like someone who isn’t worried, and nobody’s checked what their estate could handle, so there’s nothing to contradict them. Put the two together and you can see it right away.
I keep running into one version of this in particular. Someone who wouldn’t go near an emerging markets fund, who moved everything into GICs at 58 because the swings bothered her, who wants to talk through sequence of returns risk before she takes out a single dollar, and yet her estate’s sitting there completely exposed. She has no idea. Nobody’s ever mentioned it, because the person who handles her portfolio and the person who drew up her will have never spoken to each other.
Three questions you can ask yourself
You don’t need a planner for this. You need a bit of quiet time and a willingness to answer honestly, and “honestly” is the hard part.
What are you actually prepared to leave behind? Not what you’re hoping for. What you could live with if it went badly. A few weeks of delay, fine. Some confusion, probably survivable. Where does it stop being fine? Ask most people and they’ll say they’re fine with a bit of delay. Show them what a bit of delay actually looks like and they stop saying that.
What can your people absorb? This one’s barely about you at all. Can anyone get to cash quickly, or is it all tied up in property? And if your registered accounts pay straight out to the people you named, is there anything left in the estate to cover the tax bill they trigger? Does the person you named know you named them, and could they do it while they’re grieving, working, and maybe living three provinces away? If your family had to make one hard decision together with nothing from you to guide them, how would that go? You already know.
Does your plan produce what you want? If you want a particular outcome, something has to make it happen. A beneficiary designation beats your will, so when those two disagree, the designation wins and what you wanted in your will loses. If you want everything split evenly and the biggest thing you own is a house, somebody’s got to buy somebody out, and that takes money that might not be there. Your intentions don’t carry themselves out.
Most people have never asked themselves any of those three questions. They have a will, and they figure the will covers it.
I built The Inherited Risk™ after watching too many families find out the hard way what nobody had asked. It walks you through your own tolerance, what your estate could actually absorb, and whether what you’ve built delivers what you say you want. Then it shows you where you’re exposed and what to do about each one.
This part’s about people, not paperwork
Documents are easy to review. You can hold them, date them, tick them off. Capacity is about the people around you, which is why nobody looks at it and why it’s the part that decides everything.
Your executor’s capacity is their time, their competence, their health, and where they stand with everybody else in the family. Your estate’s capacity is whether things can turn into cash without losing money on the way. Your family’s capacity is whether they can disagree in a lawyer’s office and still show up at Christmas.
None of that shows up in a will, and all of it shows up in what actually happens.
THE PART SHE COULDN’T HAVE KNOWN
Kateryna’s mother had a good will. It was clear, it was current, and the family got along, which everyone assumes is the hard part. What nobody had thought about was that her mother had been running the household on her own for eleven years. The utilities and the house insurance came out of an account that froze the day she died, and the house sat empty for six weeks while waiting for probate. The insurer’s vacancy clause had already voided the coverage at thirty days. Nothing happened to that house, and Kateryna calls it the luckiest six weeks of her life. Her mother had a good will. Nobody had ever asked what her estate could withstand.
I’ve watched a family come through losing a parent still intact, because there was money available and instructions that made sense. I’ve watched families with a great deal more money come apart completely, because there was neither. It was almost never about how much they had. It was about whether anyone had ever asked what their people and the estate could handle.
Here’s the part I want you to remember. You can’t change what your family’s capable of, but you do get to decide how much you ask of them. Cash can be created. An executor can be chosen because they’re capable, not because they were born first. Instructions can be written down while you’re still here to write them. Every one of those decisions takes weight off the people who come after you, and every one of them is available to you today.
That’s what the assessment is for. Not so you’ll worry about it. So you can go and fix it.
Visit our services page to see how we can help.
Watch our video here, or watch on our YouTube Channel:
Prefer a podcast? Listen here!
Please send us your questions or share your comments.
Disclaimer: This content is for general information only and is not legal, financial, medical, or tax advice.
