AI: Executor Superpower or Liability?

Executor’s desk with laptop, estate documents folder, and checklist, representing AI tools supporting estate administration.

AI Estate Administration: What Executors Need to Know

Executors are increasingly using AI tools to help them manage estate work. Not necessarily because they are interested in technology, but because they find themselves overwhelmed.

They’re facing unfamiliar documents, long email chains, confusing instructions from institutions, and timelines that feel unclear. When someone suggests that AI can summarize information, draft emails, or help organize tasks, it feels practical. Even responsible.

And sometimes, it is.

As AI estate administration tools become more visible, what is becoming increasingly clear is that AI changes how executors work in ways that aren’t always obvious. Some of the tools can genuinely help. Others can create new risks around accuracy, privacy, and liability that executors don’t always see until later.

This isn’t a technical discussion. And it’s not about whether AI is good or bad. It’s a practical one. Because how executors use these tools can affect how defensible their decisions are, and how exposed they may be if something goes wrong.


Where AI Can Be Helpful In Estate Administration

Used carefully, AI can help with organizing information and keeping track of details. But it doesn’t replace an executor’s judgment or responsibilities.

Executors are using AI to:

  • Summarize long email threads or meeting notes
  • Turn scattered information into task lists
  • Draft neutral, professional messages to institutions or beneficiaries
  • Reword technical explanations into plain language for their own understanding

In these situations, the executor is still making decisions. The tool is helping them process information they already have.

For many people, that kind of support can reduce stress and help them feel more confident moving through unfamiliar territory.

Bernice’s Experience

Bernice, as executor of her father’s estate, was juggling more than thirty emails between a lawyer, a realtor, and two beneficiaries about selling the family home. She used an AI tool to condense the email thread into a short summary and create a simple checklist of next steps. The original emails stayed in her files, and she still checked key details against the source messages. The AI did not make decisions for her, but it helped her see the sequence of tasks more clearly so she could move things forward with less stress.


Where Problems Start To Appear

The line usually gets crossed when AI moves from organizing information to interpreting it.

AI tools don’t automatically know which province or territory an estate is in, or which laws apply, unless you explicitly tell them. Even when you do, they are not checking a live legal database or interpreting court decisions. They generate responses based on patterns in text, which means they can be wrong, out of date, or incomplete about legislation, rules, or how a specific clause has been interpreted.

They generate responses based on patterns, not legal responsibility.

That can be dangerous when an executor assumes an answer is reliable because it sounds authoritative.

Privacy is another area where risk is not always obvious. Executors handle deeply personal information: financial records, SINs, medical details, and family conflict. Uploading documents or detailed information into public AI tools can expose that data in ways the executor did not intend or fully understand.

Adam’s Problem

When Adam was named executor he thought he could turn to AI for help. He uploaded a scanned will and several bank statements into an AI tool to get a quick summary and checklist. Later, when a beneficiary questioned how personal information had been handled, Adam couldn’t clearly explain where the data had gone or whether it had been stored. What felt like a harmless efficiency step turned into a privacy concern.

There’s also the issue of record-keeping. Estate administration isn’t just about doing the right thing. It’s also about being able to demonstrate how decisions were made.

AI generated summaries don’t always show their sources. If a decision is challenged, an executor still needs original documents and a clear paper trail. An AI output on its own does not provide that.


The Fiduciary Obligation Doesn’t Change

Executors aren’t expected to be experts. But they are expected to act prudently.

That includes:

  • Verifying information before acting on it
  • Protecting confidential estate information
  • Knowing when something crosses into legal or tax advice
  • Keeping clear and defensible records

AI doesn’t change or reduce those responsibilities. It doesn’t share liability. If an error occurs, the executor is still accountable.

This is often the point where executors realize they don’t need more tools. What the need is clarity about where the risks are.

If you’re acting as an executor and are unsure whether AI is helping or creating risk, now is a good time to get professional guidance. As a Certified Executor Advisor, I regularly help executors sort out what they can safely handle themselves and where they should seek legal or tax advice.  You can contact me through NEXsteps to book an Executor Clarity Consultation. A short conversation early on can prevent much bigger problems later.


A Tool, Not A Substitute

AI is not something executors need to avoid entirely. But it’s not a shortcut through responsibility either.

Used thoughtfully, it can help with organization and communication. Used casually, it can introduce errors, privacy exposure, and defensibility issues that might not surface until someone starts asking questions.

Estate administration still depends on judgment, documentation, and accountability. That hasn’t changed. AI just makes the boundaries easier to miss.


Practical Guardrails When Using AI As An Executor

If you decide to use AI during estate administration, it helps to be deliberate. A few simple habits can make a real difference to how safe and defensible your decisions are.

Before you type anything into an AI tool, ask yourself:

  • Am I asking for help with wording and organization, or am I asking for legal or tax advice?
  • Do I really need to include names, account numbers, or other identifiers, or can I describe the situation in general terms?
  • Do I know how I will double check the answer for accuracy before acting on it?

If those questions make you hesitate, that may be a sign the task belongs with a professional advisor, not a software tool.

Treat AI outputs as working notes, not final instructions. Keep copies of key documents, emails, and calculations in your own files, and make sure you can show how you moved from the original information to the decisions you made. If you ever have to explain your choices to a beneficiary, lawyer, or court, that paper trail will matter more than any AI chat history.

And remember: You don’t have to use AI at all. For some executors, a simple notebook, a folder system on a computer, and a clear checklist is enough. The right approach is the one that helps you stay organized while still protecting the estate and the people who depend on it.

Jurisdiction note: Privacy, liability, and professional use rules vary by province and territory. Executors should confirm how local rules apply to their specific situation.


Visit our services page to see how we can help.

Watch our video here, or watch on our YouTube Channel:

Prefer a podcast? Listen here!

Please send us your questions or share your comments.

Disclaimer: This content is for general information only and is not legal, financial, medical, or tax advice.

YouTube
YouTube
LinkedIn
LinkedIn